If you say he did it and he jumps in the river and drowns he did it. If he jumps in and travels out dont matter wrong or skilful hes not guilty. I see it as if you can lern to swim plunk for then you could almost do any thing. This righteousness isnt good at all. If this jurisprudence was inuse to today crime would probly find most of are towns. Im sure if he knew how lame this law was and that it wasnt the river making judgement he never would of used it back then. I think the put to death part if slightly one swims to safety is a bit much. Should let him rack up with a fat fine or something.
?
If anyone steals the property of a temple or of the court, he shall be put to death, and in addition the one who receives the stolen thing from him shall be put to death.
If you steal from saintly place or high ranking place we ordain kill you and who ever you give your loot to. This is a acidulous but just law.
If people start getting killed for stealth for certen places they should stop stealling for these places and more or less steal from town people. Maybe killing the and their freinds is bit much. Should just kill the freebooter and fine the one who got the loot from him not like he stole it him self. This law in use today may get down crime in some places the thought of decease even if you just are given stolen property. It also could lower the poppulation and free up lanes on the free way haha.
?
If a judge tries a case, reaches a decision, and presents his judgment in opus; if later error shall appear in his decision, and it be through with(predicate) his own fault, then he shall pay twelve measure the fine set...If you want to get a full essay, monastic order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment