Legal Case Brief

CITATION : R . v . BuhayPARTIES : Mervyn Allen Buhay (Appellant ) v . Her Majesty The fairy (Respondent ) and Attorney General of Quebec (IntervenerFACTS : Mr . Mervyn Allen Buhay call fored a storage locker at a Winnipeg bus depot Security guards working for Greyhound searched a locker at the Winnipeg bus depot after detecting the tactile stead of marijuana . Upon finding marijuana in the locker , the guards called the constabulary . The jurisprudence searched the locker without a warrant , seized the marijuana . The next day , an individual (appellant ) tried to retrieve the bag from the locker , and the accused (appellant ) was later arrested and charged with possession of marijuana for the resolve of trafficking . The trial judge , finding a violation of s . 8 of the Canadian take of Rights and Freedoms granted the motion to move out the exhibit under s . 24 (2 ) of the Charter , and non guilty the accused .

The Court of Appeal allowed the Crown s appeal and entered a convictionISSUES (1 ) Whether the appellant had a reasonable prognosis of privacy with view to the locker (2 ) Whether the subsequent warrantless search and seizure by the police was contrary to section 8 of the Charter (3 ) Whether or not the accused s constitutional right to be secure against ill-advised search or seizure violated - If so whether evidence should be excluded - Canadian Charter of Rights and FreedomsTHE LAW :Section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms provides that Every adept has the right to be secure against illogical search or seizure Section 24 (2 , on the other hand states that (2 Where , in proceedings under arm (1 , a court concludes thatevidences was obtained in a manner that infringed or denied any rights or freedoms guaranteed by this Charter , the evidence shall be excluded if it is established that , having regard to all the circumstances , the admission of it in the proceedings would bring the administration of justice into disreputeANALYSIS (1 ) Reasonable panorama of privacy is to be determined on the basis of the considered in assessing the are not restricted to , the accused s presence at the time of the search possession or control of the property or dwelling house searched , ownership of the property or place , historical use of the property or item , aptitude to regulate access , existence of a subjective expectation of privacy and the objective reasonableness of the expectation . The pur set out for contract a locker in such a fixture is to secure one s belongings against theft , damage , or even the simple curiosity of others . A reasonable somebody would expect that his or her private belongings , when secured in a locker that he or she has paid money to rent , will be left alone , unless the contents appeared to pose a threat to the security of the bus depot . speckle it was not as high as the privacy afforded to one s own body , home , or office , a reasonable expectation of privacy existed in locker one hundred thirty-five sufficient to engage the appellant s section 8 Charter rights (2 ) A search...If you want to get a full essay, holy order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper