Morality in the parolemany speculations and debates had been flourished about the base virtuousity in the bible . The Holy leger has been there for centuries but electrostatic many condemns it by not believing to what is writer . Many take the teachings into their someoneal interpretation and practice without proper fellow feeling of what they are undertakingBible is said to be the base or root in solving human morality . It has all the solutions to the funny farm and conflicts . Let s take into account of one controversyStated in Leviticus 17 : 10-14 , And whatsoever man there be of the house of Israel , or of the strangers that sojourn among you , that eateth any manner of descent I provide even set my face against that soul that eateth blood , and go out cut him off from among his people . For the heart of the flesh is in the blood : and I have given it to you upon the altar to nonplus an atonement for your souls : for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul . Therefore I said unto the children of Israel , No soul of you shall eat blood uncomplete shall any stranger that so journeth among you eat blood . For it is the life of all flesh the blood of it is for the life thence : accordingly I said unto the children of Israel , Ye shall eat the blood of no manner of flesh : for the life of all flesh is the blood thereof : whosoever eateth it shall be cut offThis verse explains well how important blood represents in the Bible Like an example , the blood of savior Christ was used as the cleansing of the sins of the world . This imagine is of the Christians Is it morally reform for blood to be transfused from one person to another ? Most religions permit it , but the Jehovah s Witnesses fence in that biblical principles properly understood condemn it .
Who is right When the Bible was being pen , the technology for transfusing blood didn t exist , so the Bible did not directly address this problem . The corresponding is true of numerous other technologies now available to us . The transplantation of body organs (including even cross-species transplants , artificial insemination , in vitro fertilization , surrogate motherhood , factortic mapping , gene splicing--these are all technologies that were developed after the Bible was written , so what is the correct moral position to take on these issues ? Through processes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transplantations , a muliebrity in USA gave birth to her own grandchildren . Was it morally right for her to do this What does the Bible say ? Well , of course , the Bible doesn t say anything about this or any of the other expert procedures mentioned above If we asked a hundred theologians to take their Bibles and resolve the moral dilemmas posed by these technologies , we would find ourselves hopelessly trapped in a maze of confusion when all of their answers were in (Till , FarellMany tribes crosswise the world eat...If you want to get a full essay, severalize it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment