Gay Marriages Make Them Legal: Rebuttal Essay

Thomas Stoddards audacious brotherhoods Make Them Legal, has some valid points, but I am non convinced nor persuaded to agree that snappy marriages should be wakelessized. Stoddard begins with the sad invoice of a snappy couple. K atomic number 18n Thompson and Sharon Kowalski who exchanged vows that were non recognized by the giving medication, and were living with to each one some other in a committed relationship until Kowalski was struck by a drunk driver, which left her paralyzed and unable to communicate more than a few words at a time (para 2). Thompson desire legal guardianship over her partner, which was denied, when Kowalskis parents opposed the petition and were given(p) sole guardianship. Once Kowalskis parents received guardianship over her they move her to a nursing home 300 miles away from her partner and forbade every last(predicate) visits between the two (para 3).The story of Thomas and Kowalski is a sad story that no couple, gay or straight, should eat up to endure however, I sustain ont believe legalizing gay marriages would hand given their story a different issuing. Case in point Terri Schiavo who was diagnosed by doctors as beingness in a persistent vegetative state stayed a outlive for some(prenominal) years via life- harbor despite the request of her husband to remove the support and all(a)ow Terri to expire arguing that his wife would non want to be kept alive by artificial means. Michael Schiavo petitioned the court to have his wifes feeding tube removed he was opposed by Terris parents Robert and Mary Schindler who repugnd she was conscious.The court ruled in Michaels esteem and had the feeding tubes removed only to have it reinstated after the Schindlers filed an call down. The appeal process went on from 2001 to 2005. After all attempts of appeals the court system upheld the overlord decision to remove the feeding tubes 13 days later Terri died. scorn being the husband of Terri Schiavo Michael had to go through 14 appeals, 5 lawsuits, and legion(predicate) motions, going all the way up to the Supreme Court to have his wishes for his wife set forth. Being the legal husband of Teri made no difference, before he could allow his wishes to be set forth he had to do his due diligence in court.If Thompson would have sought all legal options and exhausted all of her appeals, it is possible that her case could have had a different outcome. Having their marriage legalized may non have given her the outcome she petitioned the court for, thus weakening the reasons behind legalizing gay marriage. The linked States of the States is based on Christian principles and in this country marriage has been be as a religious and legal commitment between a public and a woman and we should uphold those beliefs. Homointimate marriage should not be encouraged, it confuses children about gender roles and weakens the definition and respect for the institution of marriage.If gay marriage were legal we w ould have to ask ourselves if it is in the best rice beer for the entire county. Stoddards has a point when he argues The decision whether or not to marry belongs properly to individuals not the government (para 6). Most would argue that the government does have the right to say what is legal and what is not. However, not all that is legal is moral, especially if it promotes moral deterioration of American society. For instance even though abortion is legal does it mean its moral? Our country should decoct on things that are moral whether than the things we as a people step are fair. If we legalize gay marriage, is that not a gateway for other immoral behavior? If that is the case, how then, do we expect to bring up future(a) generation with morals and family determine?Children learn about expectations of gender roles from their parents first, then society. It is difficult for parents to teach the importance and traditions of the family when the confusion of homo marriage is shake off upon them. Legalizing gay marriages will not set a good manikin for future generations. It will confuse our early days and encourage unhealthy behavior. For instance, an have end up analysis done by Family Research Council advocating Faith, Family, and Freedom showed that the life foresight at age twenty for gay and bisexual men is eight to twenty years fewer than for all men (FRC). In attachment the Suicide Prevention Resource Center estimates that between thirty and cardinal percent of gay, and lesbian youth depending on age and sex assorts, have attempted suicide and are four times more credibly to attempt suicide than other young people (SPRC).With such statistics we should not allow our children to grow up believing that living a homosexual lifestyle is a healthy choice. If we do, it is possible these statistics will rise make a larger percentage of our youth to die young. According to Stoddard A married person can share in a first mates estate when ther e is no will. She is typically entitled to the group insurance and pension programs offered by the spouses employer, and she enjoys tax advantages (para 5). Although these advantages are important, they are not as important as keeping our youth alive with good family morals and values.Lisa Schiffren in Gay Marriage, an Oxymoron had a valid point when she argued Same sex marriage is inherently incompatible with our glossinesss understanding of the institution. Marriage is essentially a lifelong ram between a man and a woman committed to sexual exclusivity and the creation and nature of offspring. For most Americans, the marital union as secern from other sexual relationships and legal and economic partnership is imbued with an aspect of sanctitude (Schiffren 754). Allowing immoral acts that go against our countrys beliefs and value does not ingrain morals in our youth.Instead it will lead to our youth exploitation up with the mindset that anything goes and that there are no standards to live by if they believe in it it is justified. In order to preserve the values of the United Sates we, as a nation should guide our youth to follow our fundamental law which is built on Christian faith. Although Stoddard and other gay rights advocates may argue that the government has no say in who shall marry and that same sex marriage will represent equality in all they are not looking at foundation of this country. Society cares about stableness in heterosexual unions because it is critical for raising healthy children and transmitting the values that are the basis of our culture (Schiffren 724).Stoddards argument to legalize gay marriages based on allowing homosexuals to have the right to enjoy the benefits and laws of marriage is not strong enough to have the countrys values and beliefs compromised. We have to set the standard for our future not doing so could lead to a nation where laws and values are not valued. Our youth would grow up confused on gender roles , not valuing the countrys Christian principles, and this countrys definition of marriage being defined as a religious and legal commitment between a man and a woman. Although we all have the right to commit ourselves to whomever we choose, one should not expect our countrys values and laws to change because he/she chooses to live outside of them.Works CitedLane, Diane. The Whole Terri Schiavo Story. WND. N.p., 24 Mar. 2005. Web. 31 Jan. 2013.The Negative wellness Effects of Homosexuality. The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality. N.p., n.d. Web. 01 Feb. 2013.Suicidal Behavior among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth. SPRC. American Association of Suicidology (AAS), 2012. Web. 04 Feb. 2013.Barnet, Sylvan, Hugo Adam. Bedau, and Thomas Stoddard. Gay Marriage Make Them Legal. Current Issues and constant Questions A Guide to Critical Thinking and Argument, with Readings. Boston Bedford/St. Martins, 1999. N. pag. PrintSchiffren, Lisa. Marriage What Is Its Future. Current Issues and Enduring Questions A Guide to Critical Thinking and Argument, with Readings. By Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Adam. Bedau. Boston Bedford/St. Martins, 2002. 723-24. Print