.

Sunday 19 May 2019

Bowen Family Systems, Structural, and Strategic Models Essay

Bowen Family Systems, Structural, and Strategic Models Theory Application The typeface field of force of Ana will be analyzed victimisation the Bowen Family Systems Theory Approach. Bowen Family Systems Theory is a scheme of human behavior that views the family as an delirious unit and uses clays thinking to describe the complex interactions in the unit (Kerr, 2000). This account will debate the concepts of the system that is appropriate for this case study the reason this speculation was chosen all over the other ones counsellor addresss and interjection strategies in accomplishing those goals and designation of short or long term focus.This paper will also discuss the counselors role with Ana the customers role in counseling the existence this surmise is some appropriate for as well(p) as addressing the social and cultural needs of the client all supererogatory teaching that might be helpful to know about this case and what ar the fortunes, if any, of usi ng this plan of attack. What concepts of the theory make it the most appropriate for the client in the case study? Include at least five concepts.There ar five concepts that would make this theory appropriate for the client in the case study. The first concept in this Bowen Family Systems Theory Approach is triangles. What is a triangle? According to Kerr (2000), a triangle is a three-person relationship system. This triangle is a part of a bigger emotional system because a triangle is the smallest stable relationship system. These triangles involve, match to Murdock (2013), two people that are the in collection and one person that is the outside group. Triangles form when the anxiety aims rise in a relationship or family (Titelman, 2008). Individuals (or families) with low levels of differentiation are more than in all probability to triangle because more emotion is involved (Kerr, 1981). As a counselor, it is best to pay attention to your client and if they seem to react re peatedly to others, because you underside suspect that a triangle has been activated (Murdock, 2013).As for Ana, there is a trianglethat has formed here. She is brainsick about surviving without her husband being around and figuring out how to make things meet because she is unemployed. The twinkling concept of this theory is differentiation of self. According to Murdock (2013), differentiation deals with the single as well as the family however, according to Kerr (2000), the differences between an individualist and family reflect the different levels of differentiation to self. A person who has low levels of differentiation are said to react and adjust their way of thinking to better suit the situation that they are in (Kerr, 2000). A person who has a high level of differentiation can keep their cool when conflicts educate (Kerr, 2000). Bowen (1978), refers a low-differentiated individuals tendency to fuse as a common self with others and is most clearly seen in intimate rel ationships such as marriages.Titelman (2008), spoke of a pattern called underfunctioning-overfunctioning dynamic where the weaker individual in the family system is the weaker of the two and is more likely to gain symptoms. Ana is the weaker individual in the family since she does not go for a job and she feels worried about how to continue with her life. She is hopeless and does not know what to do (Grand canyon University, 2014). The third concept in this theory is the Nuclear Family Emotional Process. According to Kerr (2000), this concept describes four elemental relationship patterns that govern where problems develop in a family. The four problems are marital conflict disfunction in one mate impairment of one or more children and emotional distance. In a marital conflict, according to Kerr (2000), as family tension increases and the spouses get more anxious, each spouse ends up guidance on the negative issues about each other.In a dysfunction in one spouse problem, accord ing to Kerr (2000), one spouse pressures the other spouse to think and act one way and then the other spouse yields to that pressure. If anxiety levels rise in these problems, psychiatric, medical, or social dysfunction may develop (Kerr, 2000). In impairment of one or more children problems, according to Kerr (2000), the spouses focus their anxieties on one or more of their children and the children focus their anxiety on them which can ultimately impair school performance, social relationships, and raze health (Kerr, 2000). In emotional distance problems, according to Kerr (2000), people distances themselves from others to reduce the intensity of the relationship, but riskisolation from each other. The fourth concept of this theory is the family projection process. This concept describes the primary way parents have a bun in the oven their emotional problems to a child (Kerr, 2000).This process can impair the functioning of one or more children and can increase their clinical sy mptoms. Some problems that children inherit from their parents include the need for attention and approval bother dealing with expectations the tendency to blame oneself or others feeling obligated for the happiness of others or that others are responsible for ones own happiness and acting impulsively to relieve the anxiety of the moment sort of than tolerating anxiety and acting thoughtfully (Kerr, 2000). Parents have different roles in this process mothers are the primary caretakers and realize more emotional involvement with one or more child and fathers experience the outside of the triangle, merely in high level of tensions among the mother and child (children) (Kerr, 2000). evening though Anas son is and one years old, problems may arise in him later on in life because of the problems sacking on at home right now and with the father being deployed. The fifth concept of this theory is multigenerational transmission process. This process describes how small differences in the levels of differentiation between parents and their offspring lead over many another(prenominal) generations to marked differences in differentiation among the members of a multigenerational family (Kerr, 2000). Why did you choose this theory over the others?The Family SystemsTheory was chosen for the evaluation of Anas case study because this theory focuses on the family not just the individual alone. plane though Ana went in for a counseling session alone, there are underlying issues that most likely involve her family as well. What will be the goals of counseling and what intervention strategies are used to accomplish those goals?The goal of the Bowen Family Systems Theory (BFST) is to help an individual or individuals separate from the family (Titelman, 2008). According to Murdock (2013), an individual must remember that this breakup does not mean that he or she needs to cut their family from their life. This theory should help an individual castrate the way they reactiv e in relationships and change the way they handle stress (Murdock, 2013).There is an intervention dodge that can help accomplish the goal of the BFST. This strategy is process questioning. According to Murdock (2013), the questions that are asked help an individual avoid the emotion that is associated with content questions. Is the theory designed for short- or long counseling?The BFST is designed for long-term counseling. Treatment of an individual can potentially take years to complete, however, it does depend on the individual and well they advance and overcome their daintyment goals (Withers, 2012). What will be the counselors role with this client?A BFST counselor remains detriangled in this type of counseling session by presenting themselves as objectively and unemotionally (Kerr, 1981 Murdock, 2013). The counselor is there to teach the client about the operation of family systems (Murdock, 2013). In order to effectively treat an individual, according to Murdock (2013), a co unselor should undergo their own BFST therapy himself. What is the clients role in counseling?In a BFST counseling session, a client is assigned the task of journeying home to strike family interactions put the principles that were learned into effect and change how he or she interacts with the family (Murdock, 2013). For what population(s) is this theory most appropriate? How does this theory address the social and cultural needs of the client?BFST is contrary to the norms of many cultures because they tend to support insularism of individuals and families (Murdock, 2013). BFST approaches cannot really treat close-knit Latino families or African-American families because of their close family relationships with one another (Sue & Sue, 2008 Falicov & Brudner-White, 1983). What additional information might be helpful to know about this case?Some additional information that might be helpful to know about this case is how Ana feels about bringing her family in to counseling sessions to see if there are any underlying issues that need to be resolved. What may be arisk in using this approach?After researching this theory, some aspects of this theory seem to be operationalizable and testable (Murdock, 2013, p. 451). Even empirical tests of the BFST have produced promising results in areas such as relationships among differentiation anxiety relationship rejoicing and psychological dysfunction (Murdock, 2013 Miller, Anderson, & Keala, 2004). Bowens prediction of individuals choosing partners with similar levels of differentiation received mixed results in the literature, with studies electropositive and others disconfirming (Murdock, 2013 Day, St, Clair, & Marshall, 1997 Greene & Mabee, 1992 Kosek). However, when BFST is dealt with family or couples processes, research is less supportive.The Bowen Family Systems Theory was the theory chosen for this paper to analyze the case study of Ana. This paper discussed the concepts of the theory that is appropriate for this case study the reason this theory was chosen over the other ones counseling goals and intervention strategies in accomplishing those goals and designation of short or long term counseling. This paper also discussed the counselors role with Ana the clients role in counseling the population this theory is most appropriate for as well as addressing the social and cultural needs of the client any additional information that might be helpful to know about this case and what are the risks,ReferencesBowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. New York Jason Aronson. Day, H. D., St. Clair, S., & Marshall, D. D. (1997). Do people who marry really have the same level of differentiation of self? Journal of Family Psychology, 11 doi 10.1037//0893-3200.11.1.131Falicov, C.J., & Brudner-White, L. (1983). The shifting family triangle The issue of cultural andcontextual relativity. In J.C. Hansen & C.J. Falicov (Eds.). Cultural perspectives infamily therapy. Rockville, MD Aspen Systems.G reene, G.J., & Mabee, T. F. (1992). Differentiation of self and maritaladjustment of clinical and nonclinical spouses. In B.J. Brothers (Ed.), Couples therapy, multiple perspectives In search of universal threads. New York Haworth Press. Grand Canyon University (2014). Case study analysis.Kerr, M.E. (1981). Family systems theory and therapy. In A.S. Gurman & D.P. Kniskern (Eds.),Handbook of family therapy. New York Brunner/Mazel.Kerr, Michael E. (2000). One Familys Story A Primer on Bowen Theory. The Bowen essence for the Study of the Family. Retrieved from http//www thebowencenter.org/theory Miller, R.B., Anderson, S., & Keala, D.K. (2004). Is Bowen theory valid? A review of basicresearch. Journal if marital and Family Therapy, 30,doi 10.1111/j.1752.0606.2004.tb01255.xMurdock, N. (2013). Theory Is a Good Thing. In Theories of counseling and psychotherapy Acase approach (Third ed., p. 4). Upper Saddle River, N.J. rill/Prentice Hall. Sue, D. W., & Sue, D. (2008). Counseling the cul turally diverse Theory and practice (5th Ed.).Hoboken, NJ Wiley.Titelman, P. (2008). The concept of the triangle in Bowen theory An overview. In P. Titelman(Ed.), Triangles Bowen family systems theory perspectives New York Routledge. Withers, R. (2012). A comparative study of Bowenian system theory and cognitive-behavioral family therapy. Retrieved from http//www.counselinginsite.com

No comments:

Post a Comment