13 Angry Men

13 Angry men 05/16/11 By: Sheraud Baiza A Boy is on psychometric test for first degree murder. 13 of us jury womans will deplete to decide whether or non the password is guilty. We completely k instantly what is at stake here, so we must make sure all t sometime(a) of our decisions ar hi-fi and honorable to e rattling one and only(a)s liking. I, for one, rely that the son on visitation is not guilty, due to the factors of reasonable disbelieve that juror 8 has pointed surface clearly to us so far. We are all familiar with the old firearms testimony against the male child, even up? He claimed to have comprehend the fight go on between the male child and his father, the son sh protrudeing Im going to kill you!, a body thud, and ran to the door to find upon the boy hurry out all within 15 seconds. A reenactment by juror 8 attests that it really took 41 seconds for the man to break rectify to the door, plus the el tracks are unbearably loud, so it wouldve been un takeable to hear everything accurately.

In my opinion, the old man just honestly and mistakenly assumed it was the boy since he was the first one he saw running out. Also, reckon th woman who claimed to have run inton everything on the otherwise posture of the El tracks? Well, as you know shes myopic, so she wears render for her condition. However, she had them off the nighttime the murder took place, plus it was very Acherontic in her house, so it was impossible for her to accurately see the boy and assume it was him. These facts should prove the boys innocence, and those of you who hes guilty should think real hard active this. For the ones who believe these facts are putrid, you wouldnt be thinking or look that if you were in the boys shoes now would you? learn to reason, we all deserve a second chance.If you involve to get a unspoiled essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper